The judiciary has functioned as an institutional corrective, redefining and refining the contours of the Governor's office to prevent its misuse and uphold constitutional principles. Discuss this with the help of relevant case laws.
Main Body
[Judiciary Function as Institutional] (1) Corrective i Defining power of governor to call for state emergency (Art 356) [Tagged the Manipur emergency] → [Uttarakhand HC Quashed down emergency in H 2024] ii Ramakshan Case - SC held that mere suspicion of horse-trading cannot be considered ground for Art 356 or good dismissal. (2) Redefining and Refining the Contours: i Governor's discretion on Bills → SC in [State of Tamil Nadu v/s BN Rau 2011] have defined the timeline for passage of the Bills: - 1 month for governor - 2 months for President-assent - 1 month for re-referred bill. a - other matters like Vice-chancellor appointment are still subjudiced. 3 - Supreme Court in [S.R. Bommai case, 1994] has also ensured limits on powers of Governor.
— SURABHI YADAV · AIR 14
Conclusion
38 words
SURABHI YADAV
Executive, Judiciary, Ministries and Pressure Groups
Judiciary
Judicial role in institutional correction and Governor's powers
164
Total words
1
Paragraphs
analytical
Tone