Critically examine the 'in-house procedure' adopted by the Apex Court to inquire into allegations of misconduct against judges of constitutional courts in India.
Main Body
The recent initiation of 'in-house inquiry' against a sitting HC judge forumcounted g cash in his name has sparked debate.
In-house inquiring mechanism :-
Appeal to parliament to initiate
Drawings with the system :-
Yet it is important since :-
conduct of judges - constitutional provision] Article (12.2.
How to reform procedure :-
Independent inquiry along with independent members
Predacious disclosure of findings
Supportioning inquiry through State Agencies
Bringing precise under RTE (Criminal Appeal case CJI (Criminal Caul under RTE)
This would help in upholding public conviction, i.e. Judiciary.
— BHOOMIKA JAIN · AIR 331
Conclusion
9 words
BHOOMIKA JAIN
Executive, Judiciary, Ministries and Pressure Groups
Judiciary
In-house Procedure for Judicial Misconduct
270
Total words
12
Paragraphs