Indo-Pacific region in recent times has emerged as a zone of clashing interests and priorities. Discuss. Do you think Global Security Initiative will supersede QUAD in the region?
Introduction
12 words
Main Body
"Indo-Pacific is the region where China eyes India asserts & USA intervenes"
Indo-Pacific as zone of divergence:
┌─ India:
│ • interest in eco → resources on sea bed, fisheries rights, global oil as a rising power against security - 1ST KMS coastline, 26/11 attacks, neighbour threat
│
├─ China:
│ • intent in eco: ports at hambantota, SLOG to encircle malacca dilema → geo-strategic: calls the region geia pacific to ensure harmony in the region
├ → to ensure harmony in the region
│
└─ USA:
│ • to isolate China
│ • over Taiwan issue
│ • containing chinese expansionist moves
│ • arresting USA's exceptionalism
II USA:
│ → to isolate China
│ → over Taiwan issue
│ → containing chinese expansionist moves
│ → arresting USA's exceptionalism
III. Others:
│ • Small island states → against climate change led devastation
│ • led was led body dissolution
│ • eroding inflation (eg: Sri Lanka) - political stability
Converges for Indo-Pacific can be seen:
1. → for safety from terrorism
2. → ensuring free trade (70% of global trade crosses Strait of Malacca)
3. → balanced polarity (Australia)
4. → free & open Indo-pacific (India & Japan)
5. → to prevent domination, supply chain resilience
Global Security Initiative has been led by USA:
1. members are: Australia, Japan, UK
2. it is for ensuring security in the region (ex: USA shared submarine tech to non-NATO country (Australia) for 1st time)
3. to counter chinese dominance
However,
India not being a part of GSI doesn't make it a replacement of QUAD.
1. QUAD is only a trade bloc, while GSI has wider objectives
2. However, India not being a part of GSI doesn't make it a replacement of QUAD.
As Shrimashtra aightly says, "Its wise to dance to the tune of changing world."
Indo-pacific interests & priorities are changing & it would be wise to cater to the same, in time
— Annapurna Singh
Conclusion
18 words
Diagram
Venn diagram showing divergent interests of India, China, and USA in Indo-Pacific region with overlapping convergences marked
- Structured analysis of multiple stakeholder interests (India, China, USA, small island states)
- Identifies both convergences and divergences comprehensively
- Uses current affairs data (70% global trade via Malacca)
- Addresses specific security concerns (26/11, Taiwan)
- Compares GSI and QUAD with nuanced conclusion
Annapurna Singh
International Institutions, Agencies and Fora - Structure and Mandate
Indo-Pacific Region and Global Security
Global Security Initiative vs QUAD
352
Total words
10
Paragraphs
formal, analytical, strategic
Tone