जन प्रतिनिधित्व अधिनियम, 1951 की धारा 8 में विनिर्दिष्ट निरर्हताओं में उपस्थित अस्पष्टता का समाधान कैसे किया जाए? (150 शब्दों में उत्तर दीजिये) 10 अंक। There is a need to resolve the ambiguity in the disqualification provisions under section 8 of the Representation of People Act 1951. Discuss. (Answer in 150 words) 10 marks.
Main Body
Section 8 of Representation of People Act 1952 deals with disqualification of MPs & MLAs
Recently applied on Rahul Gandhi under RPA 1951 - 8(h), 8A - corrupt practices
Need of ambiguity in provision
(2.1) L based on appeal of candidate's
(2.2) L also doesn't specify time limit
[En] - 2 years conviction can lead to disqualification, doesn't exist of proportionality
[En] ECI can subjectively reduce term, like SIKKEM CM (6 yrs to 13 months)
NEED to resolve:
So at the same time, strengthening the act to ensure decriminalization of politics by compulsory disqualification (2nd ARC) for heinous crimes etc. This is the way forward.
"Constitution is a living document" was cited by Justice D.Y Chandrachud.
The life in this document, however, is provided by constitutionalism
Constitution as mere skeleton:
1. Written materia gives in rigidity in certain basic frameworks.
[Ex] - Basic structure skeleton as found in Keshavananda Bharti case
2. Foundation base over which dynamic interpretation occurs
[En] - Article - 21: Right to Life as Fundamental right (ARK Gopalan case vs Menaka Gandhi case)
3. Skeleton of ideals of constitutional forefathers
4. Borrowed tones from several source
[Ex] - Justice - for USSR
Liberty - France
Structural aspects - GOI 1935
however,
constitutionalism is the soul of democracy
Democracy | Constitutionalism
for the people (2) allows wider interpretation to serve public [Right to health (Right to Life)
Menaka Gandhi case]
of the people (3) allows basic tenets of trust in democracy by principle of separation of power (Ram Saraswamy case)
principle of <-- counsable legislation (to protect FR & DPSP)
constitution too was a soul in itself as (B.R Ambedkar) stated in Granmat & marching speech constitutional morality with its ideals should be the nation's guiding light.
— Annapurna Singh
Conclusion
54 words
Diagram
A diagram showing the relationship between Democracy, Constitutionalism, and features of the people - divided into two columns with specific points about participation, interpretation, and principles of separation of power
- Clearly identifies three types of ambiguity: vertical, contextual, and procedural
- Provides specific examples and case studies
- Offers concrete solutions with reference to Law Commission recommendations
- Connects to democratic principles and public welfare
- Mentions both strengthening and preventing misuse of law
- Uses comparative table effectively to contrast Democracy vs Constitutionalism
- Integrates key judicial precedents to support arguments
- Connects constitutional provisions to real-world applications
- References B.R Ambedkar's vision for constitutional morality
- Clearly distinguishes between skeletal structure and living soul
Annapurna Singh
Salient Features of the Representation of People's Act
Corrupt Practices
Section 8 Disqualification Provisions Ambiguity
451
Total words
20
Paragraphs
Analytical and structured with comparative approach
Tone