Also recently clarified that a mechanism should be ensured to bring equality in removal of CCEC & EC. led CEC has security of Tenure but ECs have not. Why such inference needed? → Identify politics-paraya (eg Akhilam Singh case) → violation of MCC & RPA-1957 (Structural issues) → No qualifications of CEC & EC mentioned in constitution (text empowering status impolitely) Supreme court plays important role and does complete justice to it often (Art 142)
Introduction
18 words
Main Body
Also recently clarified that a mechanism should be ensured to bring equality in removal of CCEC & EC.
led CEC has security of Tenure but ECs have not.
Why such inference needed:
Identify politics-paraya (eg Akhilam Singh case)
violation of MCC & RPA-1957
Structural issues
No qualifications of CEC & EC mentioned in constitution (text empowering status impolitely)
Supreme court plays important role and does complete justice to it often (Art 142)
— Anjali Ajay Thakur · AIR 43
Conclusion
14 words
- Identifies structural inequality in EC tenure
- Cites specific case example (Akhilam Singh)
- References relevant constitutional articles and legislation
- Highlights vulnerability to political interference
Anjali Ajay Thakur
Executive, Judiciary, Ministries and Pressure Groups
Election Commission Structure and Judicial Oversight
Equality in Removal Process of EC Commissioners
108
Total words
2
Paragraphs
critical and analytical
Tone