Introduction
21 words
Main Body
The advent of online platforms has expanded the field of freedom of speech but also enlarged the collateral ride with it.
Smitter Regulation of Content Justified:
To promote national security and prevent anti-national content, ex: KT Pithsamy – Doctrine of 'a told test'.
To prevent hate speech, that could affect public order, ex: SC in Patunjali case while ordering takedown of ad.
To uphold other constitutional values such as freedom of religion, ex: Yasi Narasimhanand Case.
To restrict defamatory speech in line with vested interest, ex: Safest Upkhat u. Laxmi for order for takedown of tweets)
Thread to Freedom of Speech and Expression:
No uniform definition of grounds of restriction, ex: Misuse of terms as Public order
Enlarges state power and takes away liberties, ex: Blanket takedown of ante Government holds on X.
Selective application of hate speech, ex: Sudarsban TV case
Chilling effect on dissent of opposition.
— Amrit Mahapatra · AIR 121
- Relevant to contemporary issues
- Reference to landmark cases
- Balanced perspective on threats
- Relevant contemporary examples
Amrit Mahapatra
Indian Constitution - Historical Underpinnings, Evolution, Features, Amendments, Significant Provisions and Basic Structure
Fundamental Rights
Freedom of Speech and Expression - Regulation
177
Total words
10
Paragraphs
Analytical
Tone