Question Q.4Assess and describeGS2GS2
Assess the effectiveness of Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 in resolution of water disputes. Also describe the potential impact of delays in resolution of water disputes. (10 marks, 150 words)
Introduction
Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 outlines procedure and appoints tribunal to resolve inter-state river water disputes. Eg: Mahadayi Tribunal, Cauvery Tribunal.
22 words
Main Body
Analysis of effectiveness:
Pros:
Resolution by Dialogue and conversation
Prevent debate in politicized environment.
Resolution outside scope of Judiciary without delay.
Cons:
Only 4 tribunals have delivered awards
Time of decades to decide the award.
States not honouring the award of tribunal.
Impact of delay in settlement:
1Livelihood: Drinking Water/Irrigation water to riparian states impacted.
2Politicization: Used by political leaders to draw votes during elections without evidence.
3Erosion of Trust: Trust in dispute settlement architecture reduces which leads to disobeying culture.
4Economic: Federal Disputes and Economic Blockade also deter Industrial Investment in region.
5Regionalism: Entrench regional sentiment in the population → clashes, riots etc.
Reform → Single Tribunal, Time bound, Compulsory honouring of award
Use River Linking to resolve dispute.
— ADITYA HRIDAY UPADHYAY
131 words3 paragraphs
Conclusion
Peaceful resolution of Federal Disputes key to stable polity and flourishing economy.
12 words
- Clear pros-cons structure
- Relevant tribunal examples
- Comprehensive impact analysis
- Reform suggestions
Steal this copy's techniques PremiumAI pulls out the reusable moves — pick the ones you want as flashcards
Topper
ADITYA HRIDAY UPADHYAY
2023
Subject & Paper
GS2GS2
Topic
Functions and Responsibilities of the Union and the States
Issues and Challenges Pertaining to the Federal Structure
Inter-State River Water Disputes
Writing Stats
165
Total words
3
Paragraphs