धर्म में विश्वास, धर्म में आस्था और संवैधानिक नैतिकता के मध्य तनाव/संघर्ष हो रा करने से व्यक्तिगत स्वतंत्रा में बिना के प्रश्न उठता है। Discuss the role of the judiciary in navigating the tension between the right to religion and constitutional morality in India in recent times. Refer to relevant case laws. (150 words, 10 marks)
Introduction
43 words
Main Body
Tensions between Right to Religion and Constitutional Morality:
(eg) Movement of procession in certain areas restricted.
Religious practice may discriminate against people of certain caste or gender.
Judiciary role in navigating these tensions :-
Judi ciary has time and again maintained the supremacy of constitutional morality over light to religion.
Sabari male case : Women right to enter the temple allowed.
Trifle Talag case – ws Divorce based on religious practice not legal
Haseena Begum case – Right of muslim woman to seek maintenance
right of Hindu women in ancestral property.
The constitutional morality has helped in ensuring that fundamental human rights take precedence over religious established morals.
— Aditya Agarwal
Conclusion
17 words
- Defines constitutional morality clearly
- References specific constitutional articles (25-28)
- Identifies key tension points between rights
- Provides concrete example of procession restriction
Aditya Agarwal
Fundamental Rights and Constitutional Morality
Right to Religion vs Constitutional Morality
Judiciary's role in balancing religious freedom and constitutional morality
210
Total words
7
Paragraphs
2
Bullets
Analytical and structured
Tone